[OT] Senders and Receivers

[Sebastiaan Koppe]

On Thursday, 5 June 2025 at 14:41:09 UTC, Araq wrote:
> On Thursday, 5 June 2025 at 14:30:09 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe 
> wrote:
>> There is probably a parallel universe where I did actually end 
>> up writing a GC for D.
>
> On Thursday, 5 June 2025 at 14:30:09 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe 
> wrote:
>
> I fail to see the point. So write a hazard pointer 
> implementation too and see what is easier.

My point was that I am grateful there is a GC and that I don't 
have to write a hazard pointer library because of it.

It would be a bit odd to follow that up by implementing one, so 
I'm not going to. Maybe in the nogc-verse though ;)