What _is_ up with v2.110?

[Mike Parker]

On Wednesday, 5 March 2025 at 01:45:32 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:

>
> If a project repeatedly fails to achieve the goals it sets for 
> itself, that does not generally bode well for the project's 
> future.

This is a consequence of having a complex release process that's 
dependent on one person, and not a reflection on anything beyond 
that. In hindsight, it's surprising that it hasn't happened 
before now.

The upside is that it's highlighted the necessity to simplify and 
de-bottleneck the release process so that when the primary is 
unavailable, someone else can handle it.