A big update on 2.110

[Salih Dincer]

On Thursday, 6 March 2025 at 13:30:51 UTC, Dennis wrote:
> 
> ### Long story short
>
> To run the script that handles the release process, [to quote 
> Atila](https://forum.dlang.org/post/fiyfbeczwihhsbiudtaw@forum.dlang.org), you need a special ~~Windows~~ Linux box commisioned by the Vatican and blessed by the Pope himself. But after a ton of troubleshooting, my old laptop became such a blessed box. It's probably the third one on the planet, and I'm storing it in a safe in a nuclear bunker. :)
>


It is clear that you enjoyed what you wrote (especially the 
above), which I cannot quote in its entirety. Most of all, I'm 
glad you made it.

I read all the lines that you sincerely wrote. This was difficult 
due to the fact that my native language is not English. However, 
the difficulties you are experiencing are insignificant compared 
to the difficulties you are experiencing.

In summary, I congratulate you for what you have done

> ### Future release schedule
>
> Note that 2.110 only contains bug fixes implemented in the last 
> 7 months, not the new features of the last 7 months. Those are 
> scheduled for 2.111, which brings up a question: Iain and I had 
> the idea of skipping 2.110.1 and going straight to 2.111.0, 
> since we're so far behind. There's also been talk of slowing 
> down the amount of releases in general. What do you all think?
>

Updating bugs was important. Maybe we should do a little review 
instead of skipping the version number. And no matter how 
difficult it is, version 2.110.1 can be completed with a small 
update, what do you think.

In summary, it is better not to spoil what we are used to. 
Because the previous "versioning method" had already changed

Thanks Dennis...

SDB at 79