Tsoding streamed about D

jmh530 john.michael.hall at gmail.com
Thu Mar 27 16:41:48 UTC 2025


On Thursday, 27 March 2025 at 14:06:43 UTC, Richard (Rikki) 
Andrew Cattermole wrote:
> On 28/03/2025 2:58 AM, Mike Shah wrote:
>> betterC if I recall/inferred was somewhat a marketing term for 
>> the flag. '-no-runtime' is essentially what it does and indeed 
>> probably a better name.
>
> To be more exact, it is a marketing term for a collection of 
> switches, only one of which is turning off linking against 
> druntime.
>
> I am very cautious and rather unhappy at the connection people 
> are drawing between the two. The distinction matters and would 
> only cause pain to conflate, should any alterations were to be 
> made.

The spec for betterC (https://dlang.org/spec/betterc.html) starts 
off by saying that it doesn't depend on the D runtime library, 
only the C one.

So perhaps there is a way to make it clearer about what the 
purpose/motivation is and what exactly it is doing?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list