Tsoding streamed about D
jmh530
john.michael.hall at gmail.com
Thu Mar 27 16:41:48 UTC 2025
On Thursday, 27 March 2025 at 14:06:43 UTC, Richard (Rikki)
Andrew Cattermole wrote:
> On 28/03/2025 2:58 AM, Mike Shah wrote:
>> betterC if I recall/inferred was somewhat a marketing term for
>> the flag. '-no-runtime' is essentially what it does and indeed
>> probably a better name.
>
> To be more exact, it is a marketing term for a collection of
> switches, only one of which is turning off linking against
> druntime.
>
> I am very cautious and rather unhappy at the connection people
> are drawing between the two. The distinction matters and would
> only cause pain to conflate, should any alterations were to be
> made.
The spec for betterC (https://dlang.org/spec/betterc.html) starts
off by saying that it doesn't depend on the D runtime library,
only the C one.
So perhaps there is a way to make it clearer about what the
purpose/motivation is and what exactly it is doing?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list