Order of evaluation for named arguments

Paul Backus snarwin at gmail.com
Sun Mar 30 21:04:09 UTC 2025


On Sunday, 30 March 2025 at 17:45:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> In principle I agree with you, but on a pragmatic note this 
> will silently break existing code.

It will also silently *fix* existing code that was written under 
the assumption that the spec was correct.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list