[OT] OT: Null checks.

[Walter Bright]

On 5/4/2025 8:43 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> The point is that Walter seems to be moving in the direction of creating even 
> more cases where I would not be able to get any information back from normie 
> Windows users,

I replied to you already: "I had no idea anyone was using it for that purpose. I 
guess I can't change that :-)"

Besides, you could still use `try ... catch (Error e)` instead of 
`scope(failure)`. After all, the `scope` construct literally is just rewritten 
as try...catch or try...finally.


> while still not acknowledging that segfaults are useless and 
> unworkable in practically relevant cases.

Worst case, you can write a signal handler for any of the signals that can be 
generated (not just null pointer signals), and have the handler write all it can 
to a file that can be emailed to you.

You can also hook atexit() as maybe your program is exiting that way.