On Borrow Checking

[Dukc]

On Saturday, 10 May 2025 at 23:32:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 5/10/2025 11:06 AM, Dukc wrote:
>> No aknowledgement of the langauge shortcoming multiple people 
>> have to pointed out again and again. You're still talking as 
>> it wasn't there.
>
> I've acknowledged it several times,

Sorry, but not very clearly. You keep on insisting that D borrow 
checker is useful. It's true to some extent - it *can* function 
as a limited linting tool. But since the point you are replying 
to is that the borrow checker doesn't help writing more `@safe` 
code (unlike the Rust one) it leaves the impression that you 
refuse to accept the points made.