Borrow Checking and Ownership Transfer

[claptrap]

On Saturday, 10 May 2025 at 23:25:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 5/10/2025 6:07 AM, Derek Fawcus wrote:
>
> Microsoft's Managed C++ has regular pointers and gc pointers, 
> distinguished with different syntax. It was a failure in the 
> marketplace.

That a logical fallacy. It's

X has property Y
X failed
therefor property Y causes failure

Eg..

DeLoreans had rear engines.
DeLoreans were a commercial failure.
Therefore rear engines cause commercial failure.

IE. If you want to use the failure of managed C++ as an argument 
against "managed pointers" or "multiple pointer types" you would 
have to show that it failed because of "managed pointers".