[OT] Move semantics in a nutshell

[Timon Gehr]

On 11/8/25 17:40, Sergey wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 November 2025 at 15:44:11 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> On 11/7/25 20:31, Sergey wrote:
>> I am not sure what is Kinke's perspective as he has not commented as 
>> much about the topic.
> 
> I meant this proposal https://forum.dlang.org/post/ 
> vehdu0$1tiu$1 at digitalmars.com
> ...

That proposal leaves behind husks reset to `T.init`, but I think that 
was not really the key focus nor a distinguishing feature of that 
proposal. I think the key thing there was the somewhat different 
proposal for how to define and handle move vs forward. When the topic 
was later specifically invariants vs husks, IIRC he did not comment.

>> Personally, I expect husks to win and invariants to lose in D, at 
>> least in the near term. While this C++ issue is then not resolved, 
>> Manu's design does already avoid the "too many reference types" 
>> problem from C++.
> 
> Thank you Timon!
> Very interesting observations.

Thanks. :)