Code That Says Exactly What It Means
Sergey
kornburn at yandex.ru
Tue Oct 28 07:20:10 UTC 2025
On Tuesday, 28 October 2025 at 06:47:14 UTC, Peter C wrote:
> Conceptually, it works well as it fits my mental model, and
Good for you!
> programmatically it works well also. The module boundary of the
> member is not affected, unless the programmer opts-in to using
> scopeprivate. There are no breaking changes. Everyones code
> will still compile. So what's the problem then?
There is no problems as I can see.
You wanted this feature - you've implemented it and now you can
use it.
It's not going to happen in upstream D.
You can speak with Adam and try to include it into OpenD.
> Slightly off topic now:
> Even after more that two decades of devlopment, the D
> Programming Language didn't even get a single mention. It's not
> that it was mentioned and then discarded as not being a
> suitable succesor for this or that reason, it just wasn't
> mentioned. Not even a mention from the audience at question
> time. This was just last year! I was pretty suprised by this
> actually.
The real reason :
https://x.com/cyrus_msk/status/1855399721998876761
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list