D isn't the only language with janky closure semantics
Paul Backus
snarwin at gmail.com
Mon Sep 1 03:29:10 UTC 2025
On Saturday, 30 August 2025 at 17:20:18 UTC, Konstantin wrote:
> On Friday, 29 August 2025 at 22:28:17 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>>
>
> Why are delegates in D an aggregate of a context pointer and a
> function pointer, not like C++'s lambdas (anonymous class with
> `operator()`)?
Presumably because it allows `T delegate(U)` to be a single
concrete type, and eliminates the need to use either templates or
a wrapper like C++'s `std::function` to pass delegates around at
runtime.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list