std.random suggestions

[Monkyyy]

On Tuesday, 16 September 2025 at 15:06:39 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> to roll their own generators, which usually means it's done 
> poorly because generating random numbers is not as simple as it 
> looks.

> std.random is not designed for cryptographically-safe random

Insecure random numbers are trivial, very trivial. The cope of 
meta programming a whole theory o randomness that no one uses and 
writing it off as "not designed to be advanced randomness" is a 
worse of both worlds take.

I don't know what goes into crypto level randomness but that 
airnt what I want or and what I want wasn't offered