Another example of how AI is bad, bug fix for 20875

[Indraj Gandham]

> DMD is deliberately licensed as permissively as possible. It would be public domain but the belief is IIRC that that's not recognized in all countries, while the Boost license has been tested in court. Whether that's true is up to lawyers. Any way, I don't add that line for copyright, it's just there for transparency, and from what I gathered that co-author line is the standard way to disclose which model has been used. I'm open to alternatives.

Please note that I am not making any claims about licensing issues.

I am merely suggesting that the "Co-Authored-By" field was probably 
intended for another purpose. However, if this is the standard way it's 
done, then so be it.

> keep on topic please

The topic is borderline invalid in itself. You should comment on the 
PR/issue, not here.