Another example of how AI is bad, bug fix for 20875

[Walter Bright]

On 4/7/2026 10:34 AM, Indraj Gandham wrote:
> The US Copyright Office generally considers the output of LLMs to be ineligible 
> for copyright protection; one can therefore make the argument that an LLM should 
> not be considered a co-author and that this type of formal acknowledgement may 
> not be a good idea.

If a submission is all or partially LLM generated code, it's reasonable to say 
so. It can influence how it is reviewed. It will also dilute any claims of 
copyright over it.