UTF-8 Unicode operators vs digraphs

[Dlighted]

On Friday, 14 August 2026 at 07:54:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> However, a _lot_ of the stupidy of Unicode comes from the 
> insanity of natural languages. English has its problems, but 
> when it comes to encoding characters, it's downright trivial in 
> comparison to a number of other languages and writing systems 
> (e.g. Cyrillic and Arabic as you mentioned).
Cyrillic has identical complexity as the Latin alphabet. Not any 
more or less.
Arabic and Hebrew on the other hand uniquely stand out in 
complexity among all languages in the world by constantly 
demanding bidirectional text support in everything.