float init 0 request
Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole
richard at cattermole.co.nz
Fri Aug 14 21:34:32 UTC 2026
On 15/08/2026 9:28 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> A non-signaling NaN is good, because you can at least detect when
> something has gone wrong, just not the source.
>
> Silent corruption is always worse than detectable corruption.
>
> We can agree on that!
The only thing you and I disagree on for NaN's is how much static
analysis to throw at it.
Personally I'm all for throwing full soundness at it!
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list