float init 0 request

Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole richard at cattermole.co.nz
Fri Aug 14 21:34:32 UTC 2026


On 15/08/2026 9:28 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>     A non-signaling NaN is good, because you can at least detect when
>     something has gone wrong, just not the source.
> 
>     Silent corruption is always worse than detectable corruption.
> 
> We can agree on that!

The only thing you and I disagree on for NaN's is how much static 
analysis to throw at it.

Personally I'm all for throwing full soundness at it!



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list