Pow Expressions - not worth the juice?

[Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole]

On 04/02/2026 6:46 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 2/3/2026 7:11 AM, jmh530 wrote:
>> where the basically the `"op"` can be anything so long as it is 
>> delimited in a form like "%op%"
> 
> In D that would be like:
> ```d
> x.op(y)
> ```

"op" there isn't meant to be a valid identifier.

It would translate to: ``a.opBinary!"op"(b)`` or ``a.opUnary!"op"``

I don't like this delineated approach, but there are tables for Unicode 
math binary/unary op's around.

Main issue is a character can be both.

However given D is not a mathematical language, its introduction is 
questionable at best.