D should follow: "Gentoo Linux Begins Codeberg Migration In Moving Away From GitHub, Avoiding Copilot"

matheus matheus at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 13:51:50 UTC 2026


On Thursday, 19 February 2026 at 07:10:40 UTC, Serg Gini wrote:
> On Tuesday, 17 February 2026 at 14:51:41 UTC, matheus wrote:
>>
>> about the AI slop in the code base.
>
> Also Godot 
> https://bsky.app/profile/akien.bsky.social/post/3meyerixvhs2p

Hmm I read that post and I saw another one about Blender there 
and they even wrote a post about 
(https://devtalk.blender.org/t/ai-contributions-policy/44202):

"Code review and maintenance has always been a big bottleneck. 
With AI contributions that the contributor does not fully 
understand themselves, this puts an even bigger burden on 
reviewers. Worst case, reviewers are effectively talking to an AI 
through a game of telephone."


Now since D have a pretty small community compared with these 
other projects, maybe you don't feel that right the way, even 
though I have seem some PR in D where it says something like: 
"This was generated by AI, I don't fully understand it, what you 
think?".

Well I do NOT think these kind a PR should be normalized. If the 
contributor want to use AI that's fine, but they should 
understand what is being generated and not only rely on the 
reviewers.

Matheus.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list