Editions Ideas

[Paul Backus]

On Thursday, 1 January 2026 at 00:33:13 UTC, Dom Disc wrote:
> On Thursday, 25 December 2025 at 00:04:05 UTC, Vladimir 
> Panteleev wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 24 December 2025 at 18:10:52 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe 
>> wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> Your list looks good; one thing I'd add is that if you have 
>> `@property ref int foo()` then `&foo` should get you an `int*`.
>
> There is one more thing that I would wish from @property:
>
> If I write a @property template, it should be callable by 
> T.myProp instead of myProp!T, so that it is not distinct from 
> "buildin" properies of a type. This would make it much easier 
> to write generic code using them.

This already works lol.

```d
struct S {}
@property int foo(T)(T t) => 123;

void main()
{
     S s;
     assert(s.foo == 123); // ok
}
```