[OT] web assembly memory model

[Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole]

On 05/01/2026 1:33 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation. What it suggest to me is that a subset of D 
> will work perfectly fine with WASM.

Yes it should do, but it'll be limited enough that people will get 
annoyed with it rather fast, at the very least I would.

Not worth my time building up a new backend and a new runtime for it.

The whole time it'll be nope can't do that, or that or that... Ugh me no 
like.