Generative AI and D: comparison with other language projects

[Adam Wilson]

On Monday, 6 July 2026 at 23:27:58 UTC, Indraj Gandham wrote:
> In response to a user suggestion in another thread that Phobos 
> should segment LLM-generated code, it was made clear by one of 
> the developers working on v3 that "all of the stdlib would end 
> up in the LLM segment".

You are taking my comment entirely out of context and deceptively 
framing it. The users suggestion was to preemptively segment 
*ALL* code that was touched by LLM's in *any way*. My response 
was that over time, as LLM's touch more and more of the code, 
then in short order "all of the stdlib would end up in the LLM 
segment". Which is objectively correct.

You are trying to make it sound like I said that we would be 
forcing all Pv3 code into the LLM segment specifically so that we 
can freely use LLMs on Phobos 3. This is false. The truth of my 
statement is self-evident in it's full context and is far less 
provocative than your framing of the quote would suggest. I was 
describing the end-state of the users request. It was *NOT* a 
position statement about how Phobos 3 development is to be 
conducted.

If you are going to make an argument using my words, please have 
the basic courtesy to include the full context. You are not doing 
your argument any favors by cherry-picking a quotes then using a 
deceptive framing on it to make it sound like I said something 
far more provocative than I did. You will not win debates by 
deceiving your audience.

(Link to the referenced post for any interested readers: 
https://forum.dlang.org/post/vekjnpgkwkspznqpceej@forum.dlang.org)