AI Experience with D

[Paolo Invernizzi]

On Sunday, 24 May 2026 at 08:19:55 UTC, Anton Pastukhov wrote:
> On Sunday, 24 May 2026 at 05:54:22 UTC, harakim wrote:
>
>> My experience: Claude had no trouble with D.
>
> Yup, LLMs are comparatively good with D, to my surprise. It 
> seems there is enough training data around for them to make 
> sense of it. I'm wondering how newer languages (Nim, Zig etc) 
> fare.

They are really good with languages that have the luxury of 
turning lots of RT errors in CT errors.

D is among them, claude-code opus 4.7 is _really good_ in 
handling D codebase.

/P