Do people from DLF look at DUB PRs?

[Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole]

On 04/11/2026 4:25 AM, jmh530 wrote:
> On Monday, 2 November 2026 at 23:29:39 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew 
> Cattermole wrote:
>> On 03/11/2026 11:02 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
>>> As the title says - is this project actually in "maintenance-only" 
>>> mode? If so, does it not concern anyone (it should)? I see PRs with 
>>> no feedback (mine included) for weeks, even years. If whoever is 
>>> responsible for this project does not provide feedback to our PRs 
>>> should we actually waste our precious time creating them?? If PR is 
>>> not good, and will not be merged, a simple "Will not merge this" is 
>>> fine - better than nothing.
>>
>> Well, a few years ago I tried to change shared library support to get 
>> it working nicely.
>>
>> Sonke rejected it.
>>
>> Both me and Martin thought the change was a good one.
>>
>> I have not contributed much since.
>> From DLF maybe only Mathias contributes regularly.
> 
> If you're still interested in getting that to the finish line, I suggest 
> asking an LLM for a plan that they might be more amenable to.

I have no interest in changing the posix spec and all implementations 
thereof, just to appease one person.