Do people from DLF look at DUB PRs?

[Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole]

On 04/11/2026 11:19 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 10:43:38AM +1300, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> On 04/11/2026 10:22 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
> [...]
>>> Consider this conversation over. I got the information I needed.
>>> Thanks.  My conclusion: D project is a mess that is impossible to
>>> repair and those smart people who left this community were far
>>> smarter than me. My problem is that I am knee deep in D - all my
>>> projects that I use daily, 24/7 are D projects and to move to
>>> something else will take some time, but I will get there...
> [...]
> 
> I'm not sure why having projects in the ecosystem that aren't maintained
> by a central authority is a bad thing. I thought diversity was supposed
> to be a good thing?  A sign of ecosystem health?

It can be yes, especially if development experience can be good.

> In any case, the code is open source, after all; worse comes to worst,
> someone could just fork it and continue maintenance independently.

Dub is a tad simple as a build manager, its good that we have it, but it 
isn't covering enough cases sufficiently that it is not a target for 
replacement.

I've talked to Dejan over on IRC, and we'll try to do a group chat with 
Adam Wilson soon, in regards to a replacement. Adam hasn't had the time 
but started one ages ago at a DConf, and I only really see bits of the 
whole.