Do people from DLF look at DUB PRs?

[Paolo Invernizzi]

On Tuesday, 3 November 2026 at 22:19:51 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 10:43:38AM +1300, Richard (Rikki) 
> Andrew Cattermole via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> On 04/11/2026 10:22 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
> [...]
>> > Consider this conversation over. I got the information I 
>> > needed. Thanks.  My conclusion: D project is a mess that is 
>> > impossible to repair and those smart people who left this 
>> > community were far smarter than me. My problem is that I am 
>> > knee deep in D - all my projects that I use daily, 24/7 are 
>> > D projects and to move to something else will take some 
>> > time, but I will get there...
> [...]
>
> I'm not sure why having projects in the ecosystem that aren't 
> maintained by a central authority is a bad thing. I thought 
> diversity was supposed to be a good thing?  A sign of ecosystem 
> health?
>
> In any case, the code is open source, after all; worse comes to 
> worst, someone could just fork it and continue maintenance 
> independently.
>
> I also have tons of projects in D, and am not planning to 
> migrate anywhere in the foreseeable future.  For all its warts, 
> D is still the best programming language I've yet to encounter. 
>  I regularly write tools and helper programs in D, and there 
> are D programs that I use daily.
>
>
> T

We are not using dub at all, but dub really appears as the 
ufficial package and build tools for the D Programming Language:

Quoting the home page: "DUB is the package manager for D. Get 
started with DUB, and check out the available packages."

Having it not mantained by the DLF is really a depressing signal