How Effectively Agents Write D
Peter Alexander
peter.alexander.au at gmail.com
Fri Nov 6 15:23:33 UTC 2026
Hey folks, long-time D user here and active contributor many
years ago. I recently quit full-time employment to pursue some
personal projects and expect to be doing a bunch of D-related
work as well on the side in addition to using it for my main
projects.
I've long felt that D could be a good language for LLM coding due
to its fast compilation times, good runtime performance, safety,
and expressive language features. Fast builds in particular feel
more important when writing code is no longer the bottleneck.
This is just a feeling though, and I'm keen to start measuring it
and sharing what I find with the community.
I've published an initial attempt to get data around agentic
effectiveness with D at
https://pja.name/2026/11/06/how-effectively-agents-write-d.html.
Certainly not a perfect study by any means, but could serve as an
initial starting point to iterate on the "agentic experience" of
D.
The main takeaway from this study is that there are quite a lot
of tooling-based improvements and changes to defaults that could
significantly improve how agents use D. There are also some
potential language changes, but I assume those are likely more
difficult to make.
Keen to hear any and all feedback. Also interesting in what other
ideas people have for how to measure D for agents.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list