third draft: add bitfields to D

[Daniel N]

On Thursday, 4 July 2024 at 12:20:52 UTC, Dom DiSc wrote:
> On Wednesday, 3 July 2024 at 19:02:59 UTC, Dave P. wrote:
>> Wouldn’t a more D-like syntax be to have the number of bits 
>> following the type instead of following the variable name? 
>> This would be more consistent with how D arrays are different 
>> than C arrays.
>>
>> ```D
>> struct Foo {
>>     uint:4 x;
>>     uint:5 y;
>> }
>> ```
>
> I like this. As for arrays it's much more readable than the C 
> syntax.

Yes, good idea.