Safer D first draft

[Walter Bright]

On 9/23/2024 5:24 AM, Paul Backus wrote:
> Does that mean this is intended to be a transitional feature to help users 
> migrate their code to a future @safe-by-default edition of D? Or are we giving 
> up on @safe-by-default, and replacing it with this proposal?

It means our current method of all-or-nothing with @safe is a bridge too far for 
a lot of code.

Whether it is transitional or not, the more errors detected at compile time, the 
better.