Third and Hopefully Last Draft: Primary Type Syntax
Quirin Schroll
qs.il.paperinik at gmail.com
Tue Sep 24 20:52:45 UTC 2024
On Monday, 23 September 2024 at 19:03:47 UTC, Quirin Schroll
wrote:
> I’ll commit my stuff probably tomorrow. I can’t do it now,
> unfortunately.
Done. And I updated the DIP draft to include the new Maximum
Munch exceptions.
I did everything as suggested in my post, except for the
anonymous class stuff. There, I was mistaken. The constructor
arguments go first, then the base class / interfaces follow:
```
new class ConstructorArgs? AnonBaseClassList? AggregateBody
```
This means there is no real issue. If someone writes `new class
(Object)`, that’s a compile error today (if `Object` refers to a
type, which it usually does) as parsing takes `(Object)` as the
argument list, and it will stay one. Someone who wants to
surround a the first base class / interface with parentheses has
to use an explicit empty argument list, e.g. `new class ()
(Object) {}`.
----
Please review the latest draft
[here](https://forum.dlang.org/post/cekqyahwnumvesppxsfs@forum.dlang.org).
More information about the dip.development
mailing list