Second Draft: Coroutines

[Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole]

On 04/02/2025 12:42 PM, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote:
>     Like I said; you explaint that only |opConstructCo| is the method /
>     function that should be called to construct coroutines by the AST
>     lowering, even called it a "new operator", but you still failed to
>     include it in the section for changes to the language documentation.
>     While it's correct that it's not needed for the grammar section, it
>     is described in an text with starts with "a /potential/ shell"
>     telling me as a implementor that this is *not* required while infact
>     it is; just like you said: its an new operator, so it should be
>     clearly marked as such. Maybe in a new section after the grammar
>     changes, or wherever, as long as it's more clearly that it is
>     required as you yourself said:
> 
> Its not in the grammar section because operator overloads are not here:
> 
> https://dlang.org/spec/grammar.html <https://dlang.org/spec/grammar.html>

Okay I changed my mind.

"In addition to syntax changes there is a new operator overload 
``opConstructCo``  which is a static method. This will flag the type it 
is within as an instanceable library coroutine type."