First Draft: Implicit Type Template Instantiation via Constructors
Meta
jared771 at gmail.com
Mon May 12 23:18:38 UTC 2025
On Thursday, 20 March 2025 at 18:01:05 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
> You spell "Changes" wrong, you better fixed that.
Thank you, fixed.
> It is a straight up massive miss opportunity to not handle
> Partial template parameter deduction here. C++ doesn't even
> handle that edge case which due to that you had to resort to an
> all or nothing in C++, which can be very annoying at times.
I know, and I agree, but that can be added by a later DIP, and
W&A suggested that _this_ DIP be as simple as possible. We hope
to expand on this feature further with subsequent proposals; this
is just a first step.
More information about the dip.development
mailing list