First Draft: Nominal Sum Types via `enum union` and `switch` Expressions
Paul Backus
snarwin at gmail.com
Thu Sep 17 12:24:56 UTC 2026
On Tuesday, 15 September 2026 at 22:25:13 UTC, Meta wrote:
> The compiler can lower a switch expression into a jump table,
> instead of the nested lambda calls of the current library
> solutions. Even if they're aggressively inlined, there's very
> little chance they'll get optimized as well as a language
> construct can be.
I actually tested this a few years back. It turns out that,
assuming it can inline the callbacks, the compiler can optimize
`match` just as well as it can optimize a naked `switch`
statement:
https://pbackus.github.io/blog/beating-stdvisit-without-really-trying.html
More information about the dip.development
mailing list