Temporally safe by default

[Dukc]

On Thursday, 4 April 2024 at 06:45:44 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew 
Cattermole wrote:

>> Can you please write a code example or two? Doesn't have to be 
>> anything with a nailed-down syntax, but it's really hard to be 
>> sure what you're suggesting without one.
>
> Okay so you need something a bit bigger picture for temporally 
> safe?
>
> My way of working would mean I would need to solve isolated and 
> then temporally safe before I can do that.
>
> It might be a while before it all comes together for me to be 
> able to do it concretely.

I mean, given you're posting this as a new thread in the DIP 
ideas forum, I'm assuming you have a language improvement idea to 
present and want some informal feedback for it. But I don't get 
from your posts what exactly you're proposing, only that it's 
some sort of improvement to `@safe`.