Extending D's support for object-oriented design with private(this)

Steven Schveighoffer schveiguy at gmail.com
Sat Apr 27 22:59:29 UTC 2024


On Friday, 26 April 2024 at 23:42:48 UTC, NotYouAgain wrote:

> I don't agree with any of those propositions.

OK, and that is understandable. What I'm trying to convey is that 
*this is a design decision*. You may not agree with it, but it is 
not something that I think is "fundamental" to OO programming.

I don't need to continue this, I've said my piece, and I'm not 
interested in further discussion on this. If you end up with a 
more formal proposal I likely will argue against it, but no hard 
feelings, I fully understand that there are certain points of 
view that I don't agree with but that reasonable people will 
think is correct or better.

We can agree to disagree, and still be friends ;)

-Steve


More information about the dip.ideas mailing list