Extending D's support for object-oriented design with private(this)
Steven Schveighoffer
schveiguy at gmail.com
Sat Apr 27 22:59:29 UTC 2024
On Friday, 26 April 2024 at 23:42:48 UTC, NotYouAgain wrote:
> I don't agree with any of those propositions.
OK, and that is understandable. What I'm trying to convey is that
*this is a design decision*. You may not agree with it, but it is
not something that I think is "fundamental" to OO programming.
I don't need to continue this, I've said my piece, and I'm not
interested in further discussion on this. If you end up with a
more formal proposal I likely will argue against it, but no hard
feelings, I fully understand that there are certain points of
view that I don't agree with but that reasonable people will
think is correct or better.
We can agree to disagree, and still be friends ;)
-Steve
More information about the dip.ideas
mailing list