Allow struct constructors with all parameters optional

Lance Bachmeier no at spam.net
Thu Aug 29 13:21:51 UTC 2024


On Thursday, 29 August 2024 at 13:20:04 UTC, Lance Bachmeier 
wrote:

> My example shows that it *is* valid, but only if you jump 
> through unnecessary hoops.

I don't mean valid, I mean you can already write code that is 
equivalent to the caller.


More information about the dip.ideas mailing list