Type state analysis
Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole
richard at cattermole.co.nz
Sat Mar 30 02:41:24 UTC 2024
On 30/03/2024 3:30 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> Isn't it a big ask to get people to add all those annotations?
If people had to write annotations yes.
The key will be making sure that they don't have to, the defaults should
be good enough, or at bare minimum match what we assume today.
What I am unsure about currently is related to pointers (that are not
the this pointer).
Should we require them to be nonnull by default and allow people to opt
out like in other languages, or do we go in the inverse and go with what
we have now and stick to initialized and must be opt-in to the stronger
type state of nonnull.
Slices are quite often null on purpose, what about them?
What about consistency between @safe and @system?
There are some unanswered questions that may be better answered after
experience with it. Although I'm in favor of doing things differently
than other languages and make people think about their assumptions for
their code, rather than assume stronger guarantees that may not have
been considered.
More information about the dip.ideas
mailing list