Detached unit tests

[Timon Gehr]

On 4/30/24 19:02, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> I want to propose that we provide a mechanism to semantically detach 
> unit tests from the scope they are written in. Such unittests would be 
> treated as if they were not in the same scope or module. This includes 
> detached unit tests inside templates. The only stipulation is that the 
> current module is assumed imported.
> 
> For a strawman syntax, let's do what everyone does ... overload `static`!
> 
> ...
> 
> thoughts?
> 
> -Steve

Looks useful, as usually you want to test the API. Maybe this should 
have been the default behavior for unit tests with `public` visibility.