Pattern matching: Callback For Matching Type
monkyyy
crazymonkyyy at gmail.com
Wed May 29 19:39:49 UTC 2024
On Wednesday, 29 May 2024 at 19:10:33 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew
Cattermole wrote:
>
>> I see no obvious way "value specialization" would work here
>
> Indeed.
>
> It would be good to make sure we're not painting ourselves in a
> corner for such language features. So if others who care about
> it can figure it out, that'll be great.
I care far more about value specialization then type untangling
of sumtypes
functional pattern matching maybe use types more, but we dont
need monads or nullable thats a composition of null and a type I
can use a bool instead of a abstract null that falls out of some
math theory
How would this help, lets say a networking dummy program, with 5
http error codes to checks, usernames, and passwords? That would
probaly be a good example of ifelse hell
More information about the dip.ideas
mailing list