[dlang.org] [dlang/dlang.org] 1e8bc1: Update attribute.dd
GitHub via dlang.org
dlang.org at puremagic.com
Sun Aug 28 08:31:16 PDT 2016
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org
Commit: 1e8bc1adc7b60606818a8e5f3f7e779eea4ab8cd
https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/commit/1e8bc1adc7b60606818a8e5f3f7e779eea4ab8cd
Author: jmh530 <jmh530 at users.noreply.github.com>
Date: 2016-07-11 (Mon, 11 Jul 2016)
Changed paths:
M spec/attribute.dd
Log Message:
-----------
Update attribute.dd
Re-ordering the text to put a greater emphasis on describing abstract member functions before abstract classes. Also, fleshed out some of the details a little bit more.
Commit: a9fec805af09fa163839b42d77c3a699bf01af78
https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/commit/a9fec805af09fa163839b42d77c3a699bf01af78
Author: jmh530 <jmh530 at users.noreply.github.com>
Date: 2016-08-03 (Wed, 03 Aug 2016)
Changed paths:
M spec/attribute.dd
Log Message:
-----------
Fixing grammar
Addressing comment by Basile Burg to remove within it
Commit: 5f9e91fd509faecf0d62748846dc278ffff849e9
https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/commit/5f9e91fd509faecf0d62748846dc278ffff849e9
Author: jmh530 <jmh530 at users.noreply.github.com>
Date: 2016-08-03 (Wed, 03 Aug 2016)
Changed paths:
M spec/attribute.dd
Log Message:
-----------
Making abstract text more specific
Updating based on comment by Basile Burg that abstract class may be confusing because people may forget that a class becomes abstract if it has an abstract member function.
Commit: 85a0ad6e1638ed595b3037672ecc0a7a3659cd73
https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/commit/85a0ad6e1638ed595b3037672ecc0a7a3659cd73
Author: Andrej Mitrović <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com>
Date: 2016-08-28 (Sun, 28 Aug 2016)
Changed paths:
M spec/attribute.dd
Log Message:
-----------
Merge pull request #1428 from jmh530/patch-5
Update attribute.dd
Compare: https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/compare/7587ac16ebf5...85a0ad6e1638
More information about the dlang.org
mailing list