[dmd-beta] dmd 1.065 and 2.050 beta

[Jesse Phillips]

"It wasn't marked as fixed in the changelog."

I was mentioning it as it was a regression introduced in 2.049. But it
looks like I am using it wrong, due to the introduction of
SortedRange. So I guess this should be changed to an enhancement
request for a better error.

Sorry for the trouble.

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> It wasn't marked as fixed in the changelog. I don't know what the problem
> with it is.
>
> Jesse Phillips wrote:
>>
>> This bug is still open and fails to compile.
>>
>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4936
>>
>> Also what is the proper way to label a regression? I looked an a
>> couple and what I saw was a to say Regression then a dmd version. What
>> I couldn't tell was whether the version should have been where the
>> regression occurred or the version it last worked in.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmd-beta mailing list
>>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>



-- 
Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it.
  - George Bernard Shaw