[dmd-beta] dmd 1.065 and 2.050 beta
Don Clugston
dclugston at googlemail.com
Wed Oct 27 07:14:21 PDT 2010
On 27 October 2010 15:29, Stephan Dilly <Dilly at funatics.de> wrote:
> On 27.10.2010 14:51, Stephan Dilly wrote:
>>>
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>
>> 1) the client still says it is version 2.049
>>
>> 2) there seems to be a regression with pure opCall methods introduced. The
>> following code used to build with dmd2049 but now does not:
>>
>>
>> struct Foo
>> {
>> static Foo opCall(in Foo _f) pure
>> {
>> return Foo;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> instead the compiler issues the following error:
>> "Error: struct bug.Foo no size yet for forward reference"
>>
>> the workaround would be to remove the pure but that is no option for my
>> codebase full of pure opCalls.
>>
>>
>> regards,
>> Stephan
>
> Ok to be fair, this is the correct code that works in dmd2049 and does not
> in the beta:
>
> struct Foo
> {
> static Foo opCall(in Foo _f) pure
> {
> return _f;
> }
> }
That is happening because in mtype.c, line 5013, it's trying to work
out which form of purity the function is. It can't do this for a
struct, until it knows if the struct has any pointer members. This is
a problem if it's a member function.
I don't know if it really needs to determine purity level so early on.
More information about the dmd-beta
mailing list