[dmd-beta] 64 bit beta for Linux

[Walter Bright]

did all but 4092 and 5051.

Rainer Schuetze wrote:
> Walter Bright wrote:
>> Which patches do you need?
>>
> necessary:
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5382 [regression 2.051] 
> DLL multi-threading broken
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4017 const initializer 
> cannot evaluate size of forward referenced alias
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4092 broken memory 
> management for COM objects derived from IUnknown
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4069 
> std.xml.Document.pretty saves empty elements with spaces and line breaks
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1266 Cannot forward 
> reference the typeof of the base type of a pointer whose base type is 
> defined with typeof
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4598 std.xml check is 
> too restrictive
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2810 Bogus forward 
> reference error with auto function
>
> not show stoppers, but still nice to have:
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4973 map file with 
> spaces in file name passed without quotes to linker
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4328 templated unittests 
> fail to link when instantiated from other file if compiler order isn't 
> correct
>
> convenient for debugging:
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4013 Inconsistent 
> codeview debug info for classes derived from IUnknown
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4486 CodeView debug info 
> should contain absolute path names
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4014 CodeView debug type 
> info not linked in from library
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5051 dmd flag for 
> partial compilation - patch to write mixin expansions
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4372 type of enumerator 
> values reduced to base type in debug info
>
> I try to keep a few more changes uptodate with the repo (like the 
> shared phobos related stuff), but these do not affect visuald.
>
> Rainer
>
>> Rainer Schuetze wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I cannot actually comment on the 64-bit version, but as it is 
>>> probably also the candidate for dmd2.052 I'll take the opportunity 
>>> to report on updating to the latest revision from github a couple of 
>>> days ago. As I need a couple of patches, I cannot use the release 
>>> version anyway. There were quite a few problems getting my project 
>>> (visuald) to compile (on win32):
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
>