[dmd-beta] Time for a new beta?

Don Clugston dclugston at googlemail.com
Mon Oct 17 23:44:28 PDT 2011


On 18 October 2011 05:39, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 2:34 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> Any unresolved critical regressions?
>
> There's definitely a bunch (8) of regression reports filed since the last release.  I haven't tried to evaluate their
> criticality.
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?chfieldto=Now&query_format=advanced&chfield=[Bug%20creation]&chfieldfrom=2011-09-01&bug_severity=regression&bug_severity=blocker&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=coffimplib&component=DMD&component=druntime&component=dstress&component=htod&component=installer&component=make&component=Optlink&component=Phobos&component=websites&product=D

I can't reproduce the two most serious-sounding ones (6665 and 6669).
One of the others is trivial to fix:

bug 6781. Regression(2.055): Segfault with error in local alias template
expression.c(2500). IdentifierExp::semantic().

#if DMDV2
    if (hasThis(sc))
    {
        AggregateDeclaration *ad = sc->getStructClassScope();
-        if (ad->aliasthis)
+        if (ad && ad->aliasthis)
        {
Bug 6753 looks like the only other regression which is more recent
than 2.054. There's a few regressions from 2.053 though:
Bug 5364 "optimizer kills high dword of -1"  also looks very serious,
but I can't reproduce it either.


More information about the dmd-beta mailing list