[dmd-beta] 2.065 Final Release Prep

[Andrew Edwards]

On 2/24/14, 2:34 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Andrew Edwards <edwards.ac at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2/24/14, 1:54 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>>> I don't think merging back into master is feasible at this point.  We have
>>> been merging fixes to master first, then cherry-picking/rebasing them to the
>>> release branch, and I don't think a merge to master is necessary or
>>> desirable with this model.
>>>
>> Make sense to me.
> Please don't just skip over the entire earlier discussion like this.

Forgive, I am tired and need to get some sleep but I have work in two 
hours, that's not possible. I did not feel like getting into a debate 
about it right at the time as I have more important matters to attend to.
> @Daniel: I'd argue that it is only really necessary and desirable
> precisely in that model, because the Git history holds all the merging
> information otherwise anyway. But I really thought we were done with
> this discussion some weeks ago…
>
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta