[dmd-beta] Time for beta - 2.066?

[Daniel Murphy]

I am strongly against skipping 2.065.  Just fix it and release it.


On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com>wrote:

> The regression list is looking purty good now:
>
> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_
> format=advanced&bug_severity=regression&bug_status=NEW&bug_
> status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
>
> The first 3 were there for 2.064, no change there.
>
> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 I suspect is not
> even a regression.
>
> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11896 should be fixed
>
> The only question I have is given the confusion around 2.065, I'd like to
> just reboot with 2.066 and go to beta.
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/dmd-beta/attachments/20140113/56cc2123/attachment-0001.html>