[dmd-beta] Time for beta - 2.066?

[Brad Anderson]

The branches need to be cleaned up to make this release anyway. I don't see
how calling it 2.066 would make doing this any easier.


On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com>wrote:

>
> On 1/12/2014 9:48 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>
>> I am strongly against skipping 2.065.
>>
>
> Why?
>
>
>   Just fix it and release it.
>>
>>
> It's a lot more work than to do a 2.066, which means it needs
> justification.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/dmd-beta/attachments/20140112/9b55f42b/attachment-0001.html>