[dmd-concurrency] What is shared?

[Sean Kelly]

I'm not sure I qualify as a decision maker, but since the final draft  
of TDPL is due fairly soon I think the immediate goal is to produce at  
least the foundation for a solid and forward-thinking concurrency  
model within the next few weeks.  Ordinarily I'd be inclined to say  
that this is an incredibly ambitious goal, except that the discussion  
has really been going on for ages now.

I think it's reasonable to begin by at least pretending that we're  
starting from scratch, but knowing that we really can't afford to get  
tied up discussing minutae for too terribly long.  In short, nothing's  
off limits but we need to be productive. :-)

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 3, 2010, at 7:29 PM, Jason House <jason.james.house at gmail.com>  
wrote:

> On Jan 3, 2010, at 7:34 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com>  
> wrote:
>
>
>> The bugs you mention are serious. Walter, could you please give  
>> them priority? Thanks.
>
> Unlike the other two, the general solution to 3640 isn't clear. It  
> may be worth a larger discussion. I'm not yet sure what is and what  
> isn't on-topic for this mailing list. What are the goals of the  
> decision makers?
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-concurrency mailing list
> dmd-concurrency at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-concurrency