[dmd-concurrency] synchronized, shared,	and regular methods inside the same class
    Jason House 
    jason.james.house at gmail.com
       
    Mon Jan  4 13:44:15 PST 2010
    
    
  
On Jan 4, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <andrei at erdani.com>  
wrote:
>
> ... subject to the "tail-shared" exemption that I'll discuss at a  
> later point.
I wish you'd stop giving teasers like that. It feels like we can't  
have a discussion because a) you haven't tried to share your  
perspective b) you're too busy to have the conversation anyway
I'm probably way off with my impression...
> By the way - you should be able to call shared methods against a non- 
> shared object.
Assuming reduced efficiency is acceptable, there's another issue:  
verification of type safety must be dine differently for shared and  
non-shared objects. There is no equivalent of const or inout...
>
    
    
More information about the dmd-concurrency
mailing list