[dmd-concurrency] Vot de hekk is shared good for, anyway?

Walter Bright walter at digitalmars.com
Fri Jan 8 12:00:19 PST 2010


Your proposal requires yet a new type constructor, "shared immutable", 
with a new set of rules and overloads. I don't think it's worth it. 
Currently, "shared immutable" == "immutable", i.e. the two are 
indistinguishable.



More information about the dmd-concurrency mailing list