[dmd-concurrency] Vot de hekk is shared good for, anyway?

Walter Bright walter at digitalmars.com
Fri Jan 8 21:03:09 PST 2010



Michel Fortin wrote:
>
>
> This leaves us with the following definitions to check our designs again:
>
> * shared: applies to memory that can always be made visible to other threads
> * immutable: applies to memory that cannot be changed and can always be made visible to other threads (and thus implicitly shared)
>
> It's not exactly what I hoped, but it's still better than what I've seen in other languages, which practically means nothing.
>
>   

I think it's a lot better than better than nothing!


More information about the dmd-concurrency mailing list